This webpage contains PNGs of all the diagrams related to the project. Please scroll down or select a diagram from the menu above.
Map, showing the direction of cross-correlation between station pair EDI-FOEL with the resulting cross-correlation gathers below.
Station pair – EDI-FOEL, 0.02-1.00 Hz, 1 hour running average
Station pair – EDI-FOEL, 0.02-1.00 Hz, 2 hour running average
Station pair – EDI-FOEL, 0.02-1.00 Hz, 6 hour running average
Station pair – EDI-FOEL, 0.02-1.00 Hz, 12 hour running average
Station pair – EDI-FOEL, 0.02-1.00 Hz, 24 hour running average
Station pair – EDI-FOEL, 0.02-1.00 Hz, 48 hour running average
Station pair – EDI-FOEL, 0.02-0.11 Hz, 1 hour running average
Station pair – EDI-FOEL, 0.02-0.11 Hz, 2 hour running average
Station pair – EDI-FOEL, 0.02-0.11 Hz, 6 hour running average
Station pair – EDI-FOEL, 0.02-0.11 Hz, 12 hour running average
Station pair – EDI-FOEL, 0.02-0.11 Hz, 24 hour running average
Station pair – EDI-FOEL, 0.02-0.11 Hz, 48 hour running average
Station pair – EDI-FOEL, 0.09-0.50 Hz, 1 hour running average
Station pair – EDI-FOEL, 0.09-0.50 Hz, 2 hour running average
Station pair – EDI-FOEL, 0.09-0.50 Hz, 6 hour running average
Station pair – EDI-FOEL, 0.09-0.50 Hz, 12 hour running average
Station pair – EDI-FOEL, 0.09-0.50 Hz, 24 hour running average
Station pair – EDI-FOEL, 0.09-0.50 Hz, 48 hour running average
All available traces stacked into 25 bins according to their relative hour within one lunar tidal period of 24.8412 hours.
This period involves two high and two low tides, so if there is periodicity in the seismic velocities the signals are expected to follow similar pattern.
Station pair – EDI-FOEL, 0.02-1,00 Hz. No variation can be observed, but band-passing the signal could reveal existing changes.
Station pair – EDI-FOEL, 0.09-0.50 Hz. No variation can be observed, zooming into specific parts of the signal might help.
Station pair – EDI-FOEL, 0.09-0.50 Hz. Zoomed into the anticausal part of the cross-correlations, some variation is observed but periodicity cannot be exactly defined.
Station pair – EDI-FOEL, 0.09-0.50 Hz. Zoomed into the causal part of the cross-correlations, some variation is observed but periodicity cannot be exactly defined.
Station pair – EDI-FOEL, 0.02-0.11 Hz. No variation can be observed, zooming into specific parts of the signal might help.
Station pair – EDI-FOEL, 0.02-0.11 Hz. Zoomed into the anticausal part of the cross-correlations, some variation is observed but periodicity cannot be exactly defined.
Station pair – EDI-FOEL, 0.02-0.11 Hz. Zoomed into the causal part of the cross-correlations, some variation is observed but periodicity cannot be exactly defined.
Map, showing the direction of cross-correlation between station pair HTL-ELSH with the resulting cross-correlation gathers below.
Station pair – HTL-ELSH, 0.02-1.00 Hz, 1 hour running average
Station pair – HTL-ELSH, 0.02-1.00 Hz, 2 hour running average
Station pair – HTL-ELSH, 0.02-1.00 Hz, 6 hour running average
Station pair – HTL-ELSH, 0.02-1.00 Hz, 12 hour running average
Station pair – HTL-ELSH, 0.02-1.00 Hz, 24 hour running average
Station pair – HTL-ELSH, 0.02-1.00 Hz, 48 hour running average
Station pair – HTL-ELSH, 0.02-0.11 Hz, 1 hour running average
Station pair – HTL-ELSH, 0.02-0.11 Hz, 2 hour running average
Station pair – HTL-ELSH, 0.02-0.11 Hz, 6 hour running average
Station pair – HTL-ELSH, 0.02-0.11 Hz, 12 hour running average
Station pair – HTL-ELSH, 0.02-0.11 Hz, 24 hour running average
Station pair – HTL-ELSH, 0.02-0.11 Hz, 48 hour running average
Station pair – HTL-ELSH, 0.09-0.50 Hz, 1 hour running average
Station pair – HTL-ELSH, 0.09-0.50 Hz, 2 hour running average
Station pair – HTL-ELSH, 0.09-0.50 Hz, 6 hour running average
Station pair – HTL-ELSH, 0.09-0.50 Hz, 12 hour running average
Station pair – HTL-ELSH, 0.09-0.50 Hz, 24 hour running average
Station pair – HTL-ELSH, 0.09-0.50 Hz, 48 hour running average
All available traces stacked into 25 bins according to their relative hour within one lunar tidal period of 24.8412 hours.
This period involves two high and two low tides, so if there is periodicity in the seismic velocities the signals are expected to follow similar pattern.
Station pair – HTL-ELSH, 0.02-1,00 Hz. No variation can be observed, but band-passing the signal could reveal existing changes.
Station pair – HTL-ELSH, 0.09-0.50 Hz. No variation can be observed, zooming into specific parts of the signal might help.
Station pair – HTL-ELSH, 0.09-0.50 Hz. Zoomed into the anticausal part of the cross-correlations, some variation is observed but periodicity cannot be exactly defined.
Station pair – HTL-ELSH, 0.09-0.50 Hz. Zoomed into the causal part of the cross-correlations, some variation is observed but periodicity cannot be exactly defined.
Station pair – HTL-ELSH, 0.02-0.11 Hz. No variation can be observed, zooming into specific parts of the signal might help.
Station pair – HTL-ELSH, 0.02-0.11 Hz. Zoomed into the anticausal part of the cross-correlations, some variation is observed but periodicity cannot be exactly defined.
Station pair – HTL-ELSH, 0.02-0.11 Hz. Zoomed into the causal part of the cross-correlations, some variation is observed but periodicity cannot be exactly defined.
Map, showing the direction of cross-correlation between station pair KPL-DRUM with the resulting cross-correlation gathers below.
Station pair – KPL-DRUM, 0.02-1.00 Hz, 1 hour running average
Station pair – KPL-DRUM, 0.02-1.00 Hz, 2 hour running average
Station pair – KPL-DRUM, 0.02-1.00 Hz, 6 hour running average
Station pair – KPL-DRUM, 0.02-1.00 Hz, 12 hour running average
Station pair – KPL-DRUM, 0.02-1.00 Hz, 24 hour running average
Station pair – KPL-DRUM, 0.02-1.00 Hz, 48 hour running average
Station pair – KPL-DRUM, 0.02-0.11 Hz, 1 hour running average
Station pair – KPL-DRUM, 0.02-0.11 Hz, 2 hour running average
Station pair – KPL-DRUM, 0.02-0.11 Hz, 6 hour running average
Station pair – KPL-DRUM, 0.02-0.11 Hz, 12 hour running average
Station pair – KPL-DRUM, 0.02-0.11 Hz, 24 hour running average
Station pair – KPL-DRUM, 0.02-0.11 Hz, 48 hour running average
Station pair – KPL-DRUM, 0.09-0.50 Hz, 1 hour running average
Station pair – KPL-DRUM, 0.09-0.50 Hz, 2 hour running average
Station pair – KPL-DRUM, 0.09-0.50 Hz, 6 hour running average
Station pair – KPL-DRUM, 0.09-0.50 Hz, 12 hour running average
Station pair – KPL-DRUM, 0.09-0.50 Hz, 24 hour running average
Station pair – KPL-DRUM, 0.09-0.50 Hz, 48 hour running average
All available traces stacked into 25 bins according to their relative hour within one lunar tidal period of 24.8412 hours.
This period involves two high and two low tides, so if there is periodicity in the seismic velocities the signals are expected to follow similar pattern.
Station pair – KPL-DRUM, 0.02-1,00 Hz. No variation can be observed, but band-passing the signal could reveal existing changes.
Station pair – KPL-DRUM, 0.09-0.50 Hz. No variation can be observed, zooming into specific parts of the signal might help.
Station pair – KPL-DRUM, 0.09-0.50 Hz. Zoomed into the anticausal part of the cross-correlations, but there is no visible variation in the signal.
Station pair – KPL-DRUM, 0.09-0.50 Hz. Zoomed into the causal part of the cross-correlations, but there is no visible variation in the signal.
Station pair – KPL-DRUM, 0.02-0.11 Hz. No variation can be observed, zooming into specific parts of the signal might help.
Station pair – KPL-DRUM, 0.02-0.11 Hz. Zoomed into the anticausal part of the cross-correlations, but there is no visible variation in the signal.
Station pair – KPL-DRUM, 0.02-0.11 Hz. Zoomed into the causal part of the cross-correlations, but there is no visible variation in the signal.